Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-payload-tsvcis-01.txt

From: Alissa Cooper <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 17:05:09 -0400

Francis, thanks for your review. Authors, thanks for addressing Francis’ comments. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa

> On Sep 26, 2019, at 3:26 PM, Francis Dupont <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-payload-tsvcis-01.txt
> Reviewer: Francis Dupont
> Review Date: 20190918
> IETF LC End Date: 20190925
> IESG Telechat date: unknown
> 
> Summary: Ready
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> - 1.1 page 3: add RFC 8174 with RFC 2119
> 
> - 3 page 4 figure 1 and many other: if you have some control on page
>  formatting please try to put short figure on one page, and to not leave
>  for instance a section title alone at the end of a page. Note that
>  anyway the RFC Editor should fix that...
> 
> - 3.1 page 5: possible TCVCIS -> TSVCIS?
> 
> - 5 page 16: spurious space / bad indent at
>  " No SDP negotiations are required."
> 
> - 6 page 16: errored -> ?
> 
> - 9 page 17: the RFC Editor Considerations just says that the RFC Editor
>  may remove it? Looks like a place-holder...
> 
> Regards
> 
> [email-masked]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art