Subject: [Geopriv] WG: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo-04.txt

From: "Tschofenig, Hannes" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 21:43:34 +0200

fyi,

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Tschofenig, Hannes 
Gesendet: Samstag, 3. September 2005 21:35
An: 'Bernard Aboba'; Nelson, David
Cc: [email-masked]
Betreff: AW: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo-04.txt

hi bernard, 

thanks for keeping track of the issues at your radext webpage. i had the impression that we discussed all of these issues already on the radext and the geopriv mailing list (around march this year). 

based on the fact that two working groups were involved when working on this document i wasn't quite aware of how the open issues should be tackled (mailing list and/or issue tracker), which format is used to submit or resolve individual issues and how is actually in charge to add, remove or modify something on the issue tracker. 
this might actually something to discuss next time whenever two working groups work on a single document to avoid confusion. 

ciao
hannes

> > Please post comments to the RADEXT WG in the format defined on the
> > RADEXT WG Issue list:
> > 
> > http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/RADEXT/
> 
> It would also be helpful if the authors of the RADIUS 
> Location document 
> would post the resolution of the 13 issues that have already 
> been filed, 
> so we can figure out which ones are now closed.  
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to [email-masked] with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv