Subject: RE: [Geopriv] coordinates - more new attributes needed?

From: "James M. Polk" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:13:33 -0600

James  - as Carl said 2 days ago, this is already in GML, so why be in a 
rush to define something new?

At 09:28 AM 11/18/2005 -0600, Winterbottom, James wrote:
>Having given this a little more thought, it really sounds like this
>might be a new kind of <location-info> variant. Today we have civic and
>geo, but this is really a proximity type.
>
>The attributes associated with this are:
>1) A reference location
>2) A CRS representing a proximity to (distance and vector) from this
>reference.
>
>It might be worthwhile defining one in this way as a separate draft.
>
>Cheers
>James
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This message is for the designated recipient only and may
>contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
>If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
>immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
>this email is prohibited.
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>[mf2]
>
>_______________________________________________
>Geopriv mailing list
>[email-masked]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

cheers,
James

                                 *******************
                 Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented.

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv