Subject: [Geopriv] RE: draft-thomson-geopriv-geo-shape-01

From: "Thomson, Martin" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:03:53 -0500

So...three weeks have passed since I sent this email and I have seen two responses.  Based on what I heard in Dallas, and I may be biased, the work was viewed favourably.

It's hard to gauge consensus in a vacuum, so I'd ask that people at least speak up.

 . Even if you don't follow the details, is the goal of this work significant to the GEOPRIV WG?

 . Would you feel more confident if there was more expert input on the work?  Carl has promised feedback from the OGC; would that make you feel more confident that this document is heading in the right direction?

I think that work is important for GEOPRIV.  I'd like to know if there are more than three opinions on the subject, either way.

Regards,
Martin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomson, Martin
> Sent: Thursday, 6 April 2006 8:28 AM
> To: [email-masked]'
> Subject: draft-thomson-geopriv-geo-shape-01
> 
> I have updated the geodetic shape draft based on the feedback on-list and
> the IETF-65 meeting.
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-thomson-geopriv-geo-shape-01.txt
> 
> There are no substantive changes aside from those discussed:
>    o  Removed 16 point limit on Polygons.
>    o  Resolved outstanding issues (no changes).
> 
> I appreciate that this is work that is not easily accessible and you may
> not have all read the document in detail, but is this work that the
> working group wants to take on?
> 
> Martin
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv