Subject: [Geopriv] Why is responseTime holding up HELD?

From: Richard Barnes <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:14:49 -0400

It seems like all of the current proposals relating to response time 
have it as an optional parameter in the request.  This indicates to me 
that it's not an essential feature of the protocol.

As we've done with other HELD features, could we push responseTime (and 
associated issues of location determination negotiation) out of the base 
spec and into an extension?

--Richard

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv