Subject: [Geopriv] COMMENT on draft-ietf-geopriv-policy (Jon Peterson)

From: Hannes Tschofenig <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:07:26 +0200

Here is Jon's COMMENT:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-geopriv-policy/comment/71835/?

"
In section 6.5.2, does it make sense to have a practical maximum value 
for 'r', that is, before 'INF'?

Nit Section 1, "does not allow to control access" does not allow what to 
control access?

Nit Section 6.4, "allows to reference" allows what to reference?
"

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv