Subject: Re: [fmc] Problem Statement

From: <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 15:07:36 +0200

Hi all,
There is some discussion ongoing in the Design team on the PS draft which will be elaborated until and hopefully be presented in Vancouver meeting among those present.
A new PS draft should describe the need for a solution to unambiguously identify of a host independent of current access network (therefore being FMC issue) and could point to both major currently discussed use cases i.e.

-          Address sharing and need for location resolution as required for emergency calls in the ETSI scenario with packet flow changers (VPNs, CGN, ...) as a mainly IPv4 issue

-          Prefix sharing and need for subscriber/policy/service authentication & identification across BBF network boundaries e.g. via DHCPv6-PD

 Within SDO ETSI the issue of (IP-based) location identification for emergency calls is currently under discussion which could result in sending a corresponding LS to stimulate and justify IETF APS activities.
The richness of other use cases should not be described in detail for sake of simplicity and clarity but will be mentioned via reference to Meds draft below.

What do you think?

Please join the discussion here on the list and in Vancouver such that we might come up essential documents for London meeting next year.

Thanks and best regards!
Dirk
From: Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Dienstag, 27. August 2013 20:25
To: [email-masked]
Cc: Mohamed Boucadair; von Hugo, Dirk
Subject: Problem Statement

Folks,
As we discussed in Berlin meeting (IETF 87) it will be good to draft a document clarifying the issues we discussed in aps Bar BoF, i.e. problem statement draft.
Med has kindly agreed to lead this activity and he suggested that the draft should be based on
draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios
with the inclusion of the prefix sharing issue.

If you would like to work on the problem statement, please send a mail to Med and cc to me and Dirk.
Regards,
Behcet