Subject: [hiprg] Using FNV for HIT generation in DEX

From: Robert Moskowitz <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 02:22:41 +0200

As I mentioned in my presentation, the method I have in DEX for HIT 
generation is a placeholder until I either determine it is a good method 
or I find something else that does not raise the 'cost' of DEX.

Well at SAAG last week, Eastlake presented FNV:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-eastlake-fnv-00.txt

Does anyone have a cost and cpu cost for FNV?  Or opinions about it?  Or 
should I use one of the AES hashes out there?