Subject: [I2nsf] question about match condition categories for I2NSF capability interface:

From: "Xialiang (Frank)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 03:23:51 +0000

Hi all,
For the goal of more clear and comprehensive, we divide the match condition into two categories: subject (packet-based) and object (context-based). We try to put all the signature conditions related with the packet contents (i.e., packet header fields, packet payload contents) into the subject category, all put all the context or session related information (i.e., session state, time schedule, etc) into the object category.
What's your opinion about this division? Do we miss some important categories or key conditions in the existing categories? Please let us know.

Thanks!

B.R.
Frank