Subject: Re: [iccrg] BBR draft

From: Jana Iyengar <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 20:15:13 -0800

FWIW, I'll note that a "draft" can keep evolving as the algorithm evolves.
It's an easier lift than having to go write the whole perfect thing at one
go.

On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 7:59 AM Neal Cardwell <ncardwell=
[email-masked]> wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> Yes, we agree with the value of an Internet Draft to document that
> algorithm, and we intend to update the BBR draft to cover BBRv2. However,
> there are currently a few things on our team's to-do list that are in line
> ahead of updating the draft. Primarily, we want to finish tuning the
> algorithm to meet all of our performance targets, so we can finish rolling
> it out for all Google production traffic. Currently BBRv2 is used for the
> vast majority of Google production TCP traffic, but it is not deployed for
> external TCP/QUIC traffic outside of global A/B experiments for a small
> percentage of google.com and YouTube users.
>
> best,
> neal
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 8:05 PM Martin Duke <[email-masked]>
> wrote:
>
>> Neal,
>>
>> Is there intent to update the now badly-outdated BBR draft? I know there
>> is open-source code but having something written down in words is very
>> valuable.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Martin
>>
> _______________________________________________
> iccrg mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/iccrg
>