Subject: [icnrg] ndn packet format draft

From: Mark Stapp <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:05:43 +0200

I'm sending around the current draft-ish form of our thoughts about 
ndn/ccn message formats, as prep for Saturday's discussion. A couple of 
caveats:

   - still plenty of embedded questions and TODOs.
   - we've described a 1+1 or 2+2 TLV encoding, but I've been pretty 
convinced by the parc folks' arguments for simpler, single 2+2 form.

Thanks,
Mark