Subject: Re: [icnrg] ICN evaluations on publicly-available testbeds

From: <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 06:38:15 +0000

Hi

we have done and continue to do experimental evaluation of some use cases relevant to us using CCNx before and now NDN.

Some work has been published in the proceedings of ICNP 2013,  some other is not public yet.

Carofiglio et al. IEEE ICNP 2013.

the testbed is based on none of those you mention and it is Grid5000.
The tools used to run the experimentation are public and available at http://systemx.enst.fr/lurch
with documentation.

We maintain this platform and deploy experimentations on demand. It is not a static ICN testbed in this sense.

The infrastructure used to do experimental research is described in http://www.grid5000.fr

This is available to academia or in general  for non commercial use in France.  Exceptions may apply and may be negoziated with the infrastructure owner.

I do not know if this is the kind of testbed that may be relevant to the document.  It is not a testbed in the wild as the experimentations are designed to be run in a controlled environmemt and be reproduced easily.

Best regards
Luca

-------- Message d'origine --------
De : Kostas Pentikousis
Date :2015/03/16 17:57 (GMT+01:00)
À : [email-masked]
Objet : [icnrg] ICN evaluations on publicly-available testbeds

Dear All,

After reviewing Sec. 2.1 of the methodology draft (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-icnrg-evaluation-methodology-01#section-2.1) it becomes clear that we're missing (peer-reviewed) references for ICN evaluations that have been performed on testbeds. Since this is one of the older parts of the draft, it needs to desperately be brought up to date :)

In particular, the draft mentions the following testbeds that _could_ be used to evaluate ICN solutions:

1. Open Network Lab
2. PlanetLab
3. Emulab
4. Deter
5. NEPI
6. PURSUIT Blackadder testbed
7. GENI and FP7 OFELIA and ALIEN
8. JGN-X

Please kindly let me (and the list) know of any papers that _have actually used_ the aforementioned testbeds, and whether the test scripts/data are available for re-use by others in the community. Of particular interest imo is user experience and advice by the folks who have used the aforementioned testbeds in their evaluations. If we don't actually identify seminal literature, I think we can remove the section as the interest in this line of work may no longer be there. (please prove me wrong :)

Best regards,

Kostas

_______________________________________________
icnrg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.