Subject: [icnrg] Updates in evaluation draft-05

From: Börje Ohlman <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 19:38:14 +0000

Dear All,

I think we are closing in on completing the draft-rtf-icnrg-evaluation-methodology.

Based on the comments received the following updates has been done between version -04 and -05, see record below. For original comments and discussion, please refer to the icnrg mailing list archive.

I believe this should address all the received comments. Please let me know if we missed something.

Thanks to those that provided constructive comments and those that helped to address the issues.

Börje

————-

Section 2.2:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OLD

   where the sum is obtained considering all values of j, 1 <= j <= M.

   A variation of the Zipf distribution, termed the Mandelbrot-Zipf
   distribution ...

NEW

   where the sum is obtained considering all values of j, 1 <= j <= M.

   A recent analysis of HTTP traffic showed that content
   popularity is better reflected by a trimodal distribution model in
   which the head and tail of a Zipf distribution (with slope value
   0.84) are replaced by two discrete Weibull distributions with shape
   parameter values 0.5 and 0.24 respectively [IMB2014].

   A variation of the Zipf distribution, termed the Mandelbrot-Zipf
   distribution ...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Also the following reference must be added:

[IMB2014]  C. Imbrenda, L. Muscariello, and D. Rossi,"Analyzing
Cacheable Traffic in ISP Access Networks for Micro CDN
  Applications via Content-Centric Networking," In Proc. of
  ACM ICN, 2014.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Section 3.2:

If you want, a more accurate description of [ACDICN] is the following:
An authorization delegation scheme has been proposed [ACDICN]. This scheme allows semi-trusted entities (such as caches, CDN nodes) to delegate access control decisions to 3rd party access control providers that are trusted by the content publisher. The former entities have no access to subscriber related information and should respect the decisions of the access control providers.

Section 3.2:

OLD TEXT;

One possible technique that could allow for providing access control to heterogeneous groups and still allow for a single encrypted object representation that remains cacheable is Attribute Based Encryption (ABE). A first proposal for this is presented in [ABE].

NEW TEXT:

One possible technique that could allow for providing access control
   to heterogeneous groups and still allow for a single encrypted object
   representation that remains cacheable is Attribute Based Encryption
   (ABE). A first proposal for this is presented in [ABE]. To support
   heterogeneous group and avoid having a single authority that has a
   master key multi authority ABE can be used [LEWKO].

   [LEWKO]   Lewko, A., Waters, B.: Decentralizing attribute-based encryption. In: Proc. of EUROCRYPT 11, LNCS, vol. 6632, pp. 568-588 (2011)

Section 4.3.3 :
Current (-04):
4.3.3.  Asia Future Internet Forum testbed

  The Asia Future Internet Forum has also developed a testbed used for
  ICN experiments [AFI] comprising multiple servers located in Asia and
  other locations.  Each testbed server (or VM) utilizes a Linux
  kernel-based container (LXC) for node virtualization.

New:
4.3.3.  CUTEi: Container-based ICN testbed

  NICT has also developed a testbed used for
  ICN experiments [AFI] comprising multiple servers located in Asia and
  other locations.  Each testbed server (or VM) utilizes a Linux
  kernel-based container (LXC) for node virtualization.