Subject: [icnrg] Fwd: Review of draft-irtf-icnrg-terminology-04

From: Marie-Jose Montpetit <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 05:34:00 -0500

Borje requested I post my review of draft-irtf-icnrg-terminology-04 to the
list so here it is.

Mostly typos and a few clarifying questions. With the one on why we need
the IETF comment already replied to:

- RFC 5743 requires that the introduction includes this type of statement
for all IRTF RFCs, to help make the status clear

Dave Oran has already addressed most of the issues.

mjm