Subject: Re: [icnrg] icnrg Digest, Vol 90, Issue 22

From: "Reed, Martin J" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 11:30:27 +0000

Hi Dirk,

Also a  support from me for draft-ravi-icnrg-5gc-icn-04

In particular the support for ICN in 5G supporting MEC and low-latency applications seem important.

Minor editorial points:

     LTE uses tunnel between radio -> LTE uses tunnels between radio

    not sure if there a specific reason for introducing ICN-(P)DN and then using mostly ICN-DN but once using ICN-(P)DN. I would suggest using just ICN-DN
   as it makes the reader wonder if there is a non-packet implementation which distinguishes ICN-(P)DN from ICN-DN

Regards,

Martin

Dr. M.J. Reed                                         Room:       1NW.4.18
School of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering
Tel:+44 (0)1206 872479            FAX:+44 (0)1206 872900
University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK
Email [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
Web: http://csee.essex.ac.uk/staff/mjreed
Doodle meetme: http://doodle.com/martinjreed

On 25 Sep 2019, at 20:00, [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]> wrote:

Send icnrg mailing list submissions to
[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email-masked]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[email-masked]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of icnrg digest..."
Today's Topics:

  1. Re: Possible adoption of "Enabling ICN in 3GPP's 5G NextGen
     Core Architecture" (draft-ravi-icnrg-5gc-icn-04) (Ruidong Li)

From: Ruidong Li <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [icnrg] Possible adoption of "Enabling ICN in 3GPP's 5G NextGen Core Architecture" (draft-ravi-icnrg-5gc-icn-04)
Date: 25 September 2019 at 08:22:00 BST
To: Dirk Kutscher <[email-masked]>, ICNRG <[email-masked]>
Message-Id: <[email-masked]>

Hi Dirk,

I support the adoption of this draft. This draft shows the method to enable ICN in 5GC, which is important and necessary.

Some editorial comments are provided as follows:

  *   using centralized routing using ... --> using centralized routing with ...
  *   "MME" occurred as abbreviation without full name
  *   design principles that allows it ... --> design principles that allow it ...
  *   IP application utilize ... --> IP applications utilize ...

Best Regards,
Ruidong Li

On 2019/09/17 3:36, Dirk Kutscher wrote:
Hi ICNRG,

At the ICNRG meeting at IETF-105 in Montreal, we discussed the possible adoption of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ravi-icnrg-5gc-icn/ .

During the meeting, no objection was raised, but not many people had read the latest version of the draft. As usual, we would like to follow up on the mailing list, so we are looking for statements indicating support for adoption or concerns against it from people who are 1) not co-authors and 2) have read the latest version.

Thanks and best regards,

Chairs

_______________________________________________
icnrg mailing list
[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg

--
Ruidong Li,
Senior Researcher, Network System Research Institute,
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), Japan
Email: [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>  [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>

_______________________________________________
icnrg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg