Subject: Re: [icnrg] draft-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan-08.txt

From: Martine Sophie Lenders <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 12:38:46 +0200

Hi,

for those interested, the paper can no be found at
https://ilab-pub.imp.fu-berlin.de/papers/lgsw-cdsfr-20.pdf

Best regards,
Martine

Am 26.08.20 um 09:36 schrieb Martine Sophie Lenders:
> Hello Carsten,
>
> Am 26.08.20 um 00:26 schrieb Carsten Bormann:
>> [...]
>>
>> The discussion in Section 4.2 (as well as the Security Considerations for that) might benefit from a reference to
>> draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment, in RFC editor queue.
>> Does icnlowpan have any opinion on fragment forwarding?
> We (Cenk, Matthias, Thomas, and I) just got a short paper accepted at
> ACM ICN 2020, that visits ICNLoWPAN in combination with
> draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery. Many of the findings there, are also
> applicable for draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment.
>
> The paper will be publicly accessible soon, but to give a short preview:
> The problem with fragment forwarding is that it effectively bypasses
> en-route caching, as the fragmented data chunks are never presented to
> the ICN layer. In our short paper we present a simple cross-layer
> extension to 6LoWPAN Selective Fragment Recovery that allows to have
> both fragment forwarding and en-route caching.
>
>> [...]
> Best regards,
> Martine
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> icnrg mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg