From: YangWoo Ko <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 00:06:06 -0700

IETF idn working group <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [idn] Re: Document Status?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[email-masked]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i
Sender: [email-masked]
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:34:26PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Soobok Lee <[email-masked]> writes:
> >
> > I often run xterm and then launch MUTT (or PINE).
> > Even if MUTT would become IDNA-aware in the future, copy & paste
operations
> > grab the IDN-like strings directly from the xterm, not from the MUTT.
> > So, the MUTT cannot have any opportunity to toss ACE-encod the IDN into
the
> > receiving applications or the clip board area. Text-based MUA does not
have
> > any copy&paste support to/from it. Xterm does all the job.
>
> The specifications seems quite clear on what should happen here -- if
> there is no negotiation, ACE should be used.  TTY MUAs therefor must
> display ACE strings as there is no negotiation between xterm and the
> MUA that an IDNA string is being displayed.

Dear Simon,

Oops. Then I will encounter very ugly environment in the near future.

Dear idn-ers,

Please tell me that simon's understanding is wrong. Negotiation in IDNA
draft seems either poorly documented or poorly understood.

Korean mutt user.