Subject: RE: bgp spec proposal

From: "Natale, Jonathan" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:55:41 -0400

So we agree that it should be a SHOULD, not a must.

-----Original Message-----
From: Curtis Villamizar [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:17 PM
To: Natale, Jonathan
Cc: 'Yakov Rekhter'; Mathew Richardson; [email-masked]
Subject: Re: bgp spec proposal 

In message
<[email-masked]
ks.com>, "Natale, Jonathan" writes:
> Which brings up another point:  What about the obscure rule that OSPF/BGP
> router IDs should match?  Should this be added? 

BCP material.  This is not a protocol requirement, just a good idea.
The router ID should also be a loopback interface, but that too is not
a protocol requirement.

Curtis