Subject: RE: issue 40

From: "Abarbanel, Benjamin" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 12:39:04 -0400

Jonatha:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Natale, Jonathan [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 12:37 PM
> To: 'Abarbanel, Benjamin'; 'Martin, Christian'; 'Jeffrey Haas'
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: RE: issue 40
> 
> 
> Usually that means it is in beta/user docs are not done.  As 
> a general rule
> you don't want to change timers--so that could be what it means too.
> 
So does that mean the parameter is applied the same for all resources of BGP
instance/router level?

Ben
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Abarbanel, Benjamin [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 12:11 PM
> To: 'Martin, Christian'; 'Jeffrey Haas'; Abarbanel, Benjamin
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: RE: issue 40
> 
> Cisco says this is one of the unsupported BGP Router 
> Configuration commands.
> I dont know if they are in Beta test now, or plan to become obsolete?
> 
> Ben
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martin, Christian [mailto:[email-masked]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 12:04 PM
> > To: 'Jeffrey Haas'; Abarbanel, Benjamin
> > Cc: [email-masked]
> > Subject: RE: issue 40
> > 
> > 
> > Cisco
> > 
> > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios12
> > 1/121cgcr/ip_r
> > /iprprt2/1rdbgp.htm#xtocid41
> > 
> >  !
> >  router bgp x
> >   neighbor x.x.x.x advertisement-interval <0-600>
> >  !
> > 
> > -chris
> > 
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Jeffrey Haas [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> > >Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:53 AM
> > >To: Abarbanel, Benjamin
> > >Cc: [email-masked]
> > >Subject: Re: issue 40
> > >
> > >
> > >On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 11:50:26AM -0400, Abarbanel, 
> Benjamin wrote:
> > >> The MinRouteAdvertisementInterval although maybe defined 
> per peer 
> > >> basis. Cisco IOS and other vendors, do not allow you to 
> > configure it 
> > >> at all, and
> > >
> > >GateD and Juniper: Outdelay.
> > >(Note - I'm not aware of how Juniper may have caused this 
> > >behavior to diverge from GateD's) Admittedly, its not a 
> > >separate MAOI and MRAI value, but it lets you do the job.
> > >
> > >> Ben
> > >
> > >-- 
> > >Jeff Haas 
> > >NextHop Technologies
> > >
> > 
>