Subject: RE: issue 21

From: "Natale, Jonathan" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 14:01:41 -0400

In reference to issue 21, I agree with Yakov that it does not need to be
added since there was already a reference to MD5.  If we start repeating
ourselves, the doc will be huge--it is already 66 pages!

I still feel strongly that the bgp auth. opt. should be depreciated.

:-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Bush [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 1:32 PM
To: Gray, Eric
Cc: Natale, Jonathan; 'Yakov Rekhter'; [email-masked]
Subject: RE: issue 21

> 	Operators use which form of BGP Authentication?   TCP
> native (RFC 2385) or BGP's 'own' authentication?

we are precise.  look at issue 21.

randy