Subject: FW: issue 17

From: "Natale, Jonathan" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 10:09:05 -0400

-----Original Message-----
From: Natale, Jonathan 
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:08 AM
To: 'Yakov Rekhter'
Subject: RE: issue 17

agreed

-----Original Message-----
From: Yakov Rekhter [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:53 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: issue 17

   17) Add References to other RFC-status BGP docs to base spec.
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Status: No Consensus
   Change: Potentially
   Summary: Add references to other RFC-status BGP docs to the base spec.
        
   Discussion:
   
   The "Review Comments: draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-17.txt" thread then changes
   titles to: "Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-17.txt" and goes on to
   suggest:
   
   3. All BGP Extensions described in other documents that made it to RFC
   status should be at least referenced in the Reference section P.64. This
is
   justifiable since it's the core BGP standard spec.

Will be added to -18 version.

Yakov.