Subject: [Idr] draft-huston-as-representation-00.txt as IDR WG document

From: Yakov Rekhter <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:37:34 -0700

Geoff,

There is a pretty clear consensus on accepting
draft-huston-as-representation-00.txt as IDR WG document.
Please re-submit it as draft-idr-as-representation-00.txt

Yakov.
------- Forwarded Message

Date:    Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:39:21 -0700
From:    Yakov Rekhter <[email-masked]>
To:      [email-masked]
Subject: [Idr] draft-huston-as-representation-00.txt as IDR WG document

Folks,

Please send your comments on the attached. The deadline for comments
is Sep 3, 2008.

Yakov.
- ------- Forwarded Message

Date:    Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:46:30 +1000
From:    Geoff Huston <[email-masked]>
To:      [email-masked]
cc:      George Michaelson <[email-masked]>
Subject: [Idr] Draft on the textual representation of AS Numbers

The issue of the appropriate format for the textual representation of  
32-bit AS numbers appears to a matter of continuing comment, and there  
have been some calls for the IETF to adopt a standard representation  
for 32-bit AS numbers in the same way that RFC4291 defines a standard  
textual representation of IPv6 addresses. The appropriate WG for this  
work appears to be the IDR working group, and I would like to request  
that the WG considers draft-huston-as-representation-00.txt for  
adoption as a Working Group draft.

regards,

    Geoff Huston
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

- ------- End of Forwarded Message

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

------- End of Forwarded Message

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr