Subject: [Idr] Comments on draft-vandevelde-idr-remote-next-hop

From: Xuxiaohu <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:50:12 +0000

Hi all co-authors,

It seems that this draft is intended to address two issues: one is tunnel encapsulation information advertisment, the other is tunnel endpoint address information advertisment.

For this first issue, it seems that RFC5512 has addressed that issue and therefore it seems reasonable to build on that RFC to advertise any new encapsulation formats. For this second issue, the following draft (http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-xu-idr-tunnel-address-prefix-01.txt) has already proposed an approach to address that issue.

Best regards,
Xiaohu