Subject: [Idr] Re： Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt [9/17 to 10/1/2019]

From: wangjl50 <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:45:04 +0800

Support the adoption. 

Best regards,
Jianglong Wang
 
From: Susan Hares
Date: 2019-09-18 00:35
To: 'idr wg'
Subject: [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt [9/17 to 10/1/2019]
This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call two related drafts [9/17 to 10/1/2019] 
・         draft-li-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and 
・         draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt. 
 
You can access these two drafts at the following location: 
 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment/
 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment/
 
The authors have pointed out that the adoption of this 
draft since the following  SR-MPLS Path Segment draft has been adopted: 
 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-00
 
Please consider the following questions in your responses? 
 
1)      Should this SR Policy technology be included in BGP for SR-MPLS 
 
Spring has adopted the draft, but IDR can provide feedback 
to spring about putting this technology in BGP.
 
2)      Is this technology a good way to implement the required 
Features in BGP? 
 
3)      Is this technology ready for adoption? 
 
4)      Do you have any concerns about adopting this technology? 

Cheers, Susan Hares