Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-cli-bgp-ext-com-registry-update: WG adoption and IPR Call and WG adoption (6/24 to 7/8)

From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 07:24:40 +0000

I support the adoption and also agree with John's comments.

Best regards,
Jie

From: Idr [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 9:21 AM
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [Idr] draft-cli-bgp-ext-com-registry-update: WG adoption and IPR Call and WG adoption (6/24 to 7/8)

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for:
draft-cl-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-01.txt

You can download the draft at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cl-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-update/

This document updates several BGP Extended Community registries in
   order to replace the "Experimental Use" registration procedure in
   some entries, since their use is clearly not experimental and thus
   misleading.

This draft should be consider as part of the group of drafts that are trying to clarify and speed up the registry process.

Christoph  you should send an IPR statement regarding this draft to the IDR WG.   Since you normally prompt with your email, I am running the IPR call and WG Adoption call in parallel.

The other drafts which are in process for registry clean-up are:

1) draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-09<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change/>
      John Scudder: in RFC editor's queue
2) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry/
     Adrian Farrell: In Shepherd's queue, top of list.

These two drafts provide clean-up to the IDR capabilities and the BGP LS registry process.    This draft provides a set-up clean-up instructions for the Extended Communities registries.

Please consider if this clean-up will lessen confusion and help us streamline the process.  If you have other ideas for cleaning up the BGP registries, you are welcome to include the information on this thread.

Thank you, Sue