Subject: Re: [Idr] Subject: WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021)

From: <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:00:21 +0800

It’s useful for inter-AS VPN deployment. Support it.
B.R.
Zhu Yongqing

From: Susan Hares <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> >
Date: February 4, 2021 at 23:39:10 GMT+8
To: [email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> 
Subject: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021)

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (from 2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021) 

This draft defines a new Outbound Route Filter (ORF) type, called the

Route Distinguisher ORF (RD-ORF).  RD-ORF is applicable when the

routers do not exchange VPN routing information directly (e.g.

routers in single-domain connect via Route Reflector, or routers in

Option B/Option AB/Option C cross-domain scenario).

Please be aware that this draft has one IPR statement attached. 

 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/4579/> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/4579/..

Please consider the following questions in your review and comments: 

1) Will this new ORF filter reduce routing information at key points? 

2) Should the WG consider this draft given it has an IPR claim or 

    Would the IDR WG prefer another approach? 

3) Is this draft ready to be adopted and refined as WG draft? 

Cheerily, Susan Hares 

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr