Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption for draft-haas-flowspec-capability-bits Completed and Closed

From: Keyur Patel <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 15:37:32 +0000

This working group call is now closed. The result is inconclusive. There seems to be a support to do this work in Flow Specification v2.

There is also an interim on June 7 to discuss Flow Specification V2. We look forward for continued discussion on the topic.

Best Regards,
Keyur

On 5/4/21, 4:10 PM, "Keyur Patel" <[email-masked]> wrote:

    Hi Folks,

    It seems like that the draft discussion is still going on and hasn't concluded. The chairs have decided to extend the working group adoption call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-haas-flowspec-capability-bits for 2 more weeks till 5/18/21. 

    We like to have a clear answer on the following questions:

    1) Is this document clear about the proposal? 

    2) Do you think we should do this with Flow Specification v1 or should we do this instead of Flow Specification v2? 

    3) Will this help operational networks?

    Best Regards,
    Keyur

    On 3/30/21, 6:33 AM, "Idr on behalf of Susan Hares" <[email-masked] on behalf of [email-masked]> wrote:

        This is a Working Group adoption call for
        https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-haas-flowspec-capability-bits

        The draft suggests a mechanism to address our incremental deployment issues
        for BGP Flowspec.

        As you discuss this mechanism, there are 3 questions to consider:

        1) Is this document clear about the proposal? 

        2) Do you think we should do this with Flow Specification v2?
        Or should we do this instead of Flow Specification v2? 

        3) Will this help operational networks? 

        Cheerily, Susan Hares 

        _______________________________________________
        Idr mailing list
        [email-masked]
        https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr