Subject: [ieee-ietf-coord] FW: [OPSAWG] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-mibs-to-ieee80231-00

From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 09:59:21 +0000

This document relates to item 7 in the shared issues list. 

Review by IEEE 802.3 will be welcome. 

Regards,

Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: OPSAWG [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Warren
> Kumari
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 9:45 PM
> To: [email-masked]; draft-ietf-opsawg-mibs-to-ieee80231-
> [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> Subject: [OPSAWG] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-mibs-to-ieee80231-
> 00
> 
> Dear OpsAWG WG,
> 
> The authors of draft-ietf-opsawg-mibs-to-ieee80231-00 have indicated that
> they believe that the document is ready, and have asked for Working Group
> Last Call.
> 
> The draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-mibs-to-ieee80231-00/
> 
> Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for publication and send
> comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
> 
> This WGLC ends Tue 07-Oct-2014.
> 
> 
> In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 ("Promoting Compliance with Intellectual
> Property Rights (IPR)"):
> Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-opsawg-mibs-
> to-ieee80231-00?  If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF
> IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.)
> 
> Thanks,
> Warren Kumari
> (as OpsAWG WG co-chair)
> 
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the
> first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at
> having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants.
>    ---maf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg