Subject: [ieee-ietf-coord] Fwd: Re: IEEE 802 Coordination on CAPWAP

From: Benoit Claise <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 15:19:38 +0200

Russ,

Here is the latest status:

    -------- Forwarded Message --------
    Subject: 	Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-10
    Date: 	Tue, 10 Oct 2017 02:59:15 +0000
    From: 	Tianran Zhou <[email-masked]>
    To: 	Tianran Zhou <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]
    <[email-masked]>
    CC: 	[email-masked] <[email-masked]>

    Hi WG,

    This call is concluded without objection on the revision.
    Let's move forward to IESG.

    Thanks,
    Tianran

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: OPSAWG [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
    > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 2:05 PM
    > To: [email-masked]
    > Cc: [email-masked]
    > Subject: [OPSAWG] WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-10
    > 
    > Dear OPSAWG,
    > 
    > The following draft was sent to IESG, but received some critical comments.
    > 
    > Alternate Tunnel Encapsulation for Data Frames in CAPWAP
    > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-10
    > 
    > Now the authors have addressed all the comments, and received confirmation
    > from the Security DIR reviewer.
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-
    > 09-secdir-early-meadows-2017-08-10/
    > 
    > This is a notice to start a two-week OPSAWG WG last call review for the
    > document.
    > Please read the above draft and send any issues, comments, or corrections
    > to this mailing list.
    > Please indicate your support or concerns by Wednesday Oct 4, 2017.
    > 
    > Please note that the authors decided to change the document type to
    > Experimental, as stated below:
    > 1.3.  History of the document
    >    This document was started to accommodate Service Provider's need of a
    >    more flexible deployment mode with alternative tunnels [RFC7494].
    >    Experiments and tests have been done for this alt-tunnel network
    >    infrastructure.  However important, the deployment of relevant
    >    technology is yet to complete.  This experimental document is
    >    intended to serve as a historical reference for any future work as to
    >    the operational and deployment requirements.
    > 
    > Thanks,
    > Tianran, as co-chair
    > 

Regards, Benoit
> Benoit:
>
> In preparation for the coordination call that will take place on October 16th, I have a few questions regarding CAPWAP.
>
> Coordination Item 22: CAPWAP extensions in OPSAWG
>
> - draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-extension has expired
> - draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel is marked dead in the datatracker
>
> Does this mean that this coordination item should be closed?
>
> Russ
>
> .
>