Subject: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (HTML) for September 6, 2007

From: IESG Secretary <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:59:41 -0400

IESG Agenda

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2007-09-06).

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll Call

1.2 Bash the Agenda

1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat

1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a

reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet

infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG Submissions

2.1.1 New Item

Area
Date

INT

Using IPsec between Mobile and Correspondent IPv6 Nodes (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 4

draft-ietf-mip6-cn-ipsec-05.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: AD Sponsored submission. There is no Document Shepherd.

Token:

Jari Arkko

RTG

Inter domain Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering - RSVP-TE extensions (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 4

draft-ietf-ccamp-inter-domain-rsvp-te-06.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Ross Callon

RTG

Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) Working Group (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 4

draft-ietf-manet-iana-05.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Ross Callon

INT

IPv6 Router Advertisement Flags Option (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 4

draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-flags-option-01.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: No shepherd -- chairs are authors

Token:

Jari Arkko

2.1.2 Returning Item

Area
Date

RAI

Requesting Answering Modes for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1

draft-ietf-sip-answermode-04.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: Keith is shepherd.

Token:

Cullen Jennings

2.2 Individual Submissions

2.2.1 New Item

Area
Date

SEC

Transport Layer Security (TLS) Session Resumption without Server-Side State (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1

draft-salowey-tls-rfc4507bis-01.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Tim Polk

2.2.2 Returning Item

Area
Date

APP

The Archived-At Message Header Field (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1

draft-duerst-archived-at-09.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: Frank Ellermann <[email-masked]> is document shepherd

Token:

Chris Newman

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable

contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If

not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New Item

Area
Date

INT

Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Options Used by PXELINUX (Informational) - 1 of 1

draft-ietf-dhc-pxelinux-02.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: NOTE: There are significant RFC Editor notes.
Document Shepherd is Stig Venaas <[email-masked]>

Token:

Jari Arkko

3.1.2 Returning Item

NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable

contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If

not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New Item

Area
Date

GEN

Bundle Protocol Specification (Experimental) - 1 of 1

draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-spec-10.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: Proposed IESG Response: The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work.

Token:

Russ Housley

3.2.2 Returning Item

Area
Date

SEC

DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) (Informational) - 1 of 1

draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-03.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: The ballot has been split.  Please revise DISCUSS and COMMENT text to address only this document.

Token:

Russ Housley

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not

found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The

IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG

<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks

that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends

not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this

document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should

therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG

approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an

IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should

therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in

the the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG

Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions

indicate consensus with the response proposed by the

document shepherd.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will

be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.3.1 New Item

NONE

3.3.2 Returning Item

NONE

3.3.3 For Action

Area
Date

GEN

Intra-Site Automatic Tunnel Addressing Protocol (ISATAP) (Informational) - 1 of 1

draft-templin-rfc4214bis-04.txt

Token:

Mark Townsley

4. Working Group Actions

4.1 WG Creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review

Area
Date

INT

Aug 24

IPv6 Maintenance (6man) - 1 of 1

Token:

Jari

4.1.2 Proposed for Approval

NONE

4.2 WG Rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review

NONE

4.2.2 Proposed for Approval

Area
Date

INT

Jul 31

DNS Extensions (dnsext) - 1 of 1

Token:

Mark

5. IAB News We Can Use

6. Management Issues

6.1 IANA Ports allocation procedures (Cullen Jennings)

6.2 Expert for RFC 4422 [IANA #98946] (Michelle Cotton)

7. Working Group News

_______________________________________________
IESG-AGENDA-DIST mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist