Subject: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (HTML) for September 20, 2007

From: IESG Secretary <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:52:08 -0400

IESG Agenda

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2007-09-20).

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll Call

1.2 Bash the Agenda

1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat

1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a

reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet

infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG Submissions

2.1.1 New Item

Area
Date

RAI

Geolocation Policy: A Document Format for Expressing Privacy Preferences for Location Information (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 10

draft-ietf-geopriv-policy-12.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: Robert Sparks is PROTO Shepherd

Token:

Cullen Jennings

INT

Multicast Group Membership Discovery MIB (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 10

draft-ietf-magma-mgmd-mib-10.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: Document Shepherd is Brian Haberman

Token:

Jari Arkko

RAI

ENUM Validation Information Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 10

draft-ietf-enum-validation-epp-06.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Jon Peterson

OPS

IP Multicast MIB (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 10

draft-ietf-mboned-ip-mcast-mib-07.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Dan Romascanu

RTG

IGP Routing Protocol Extensions for Discovery of Traffic Engineering Node Capabilities (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 10

draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Ross Callon

SEC

Aug 1

Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Authenticated-Enveloped-Data Content Type (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 10

draft-ietf-smime-cms-auth-enveloped-05.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Tim Polk

SEC

Aug 1

Using AES-CCM and AES-GCM Authenticated Encryption in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 10

draft-ietf-smime-cms-aes-ccm-and-gcm-02.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Tim Polk

INT

Mobility Header Home Agent Switch Message (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 10

draft-ietf-mip6-ha-switch-03.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: Document Shepherd is Basavaraj Patil <[email-masked]>

Token:

Jari Arkko

INT

Mobile IPv6 Experimental Messages (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 10

draft-ietf-mip6-experimental-messages-01.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: Document Shepherd is Basavaraj Patil <[email-masked]>

Token:

Jari Arkko

INT

Mobile IPv6 Vendor Specific Option (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 10

draft-ietf-mip6-vsm-01.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: Document Shepherd is Basavaraj Patil <[email-masked]>

Token:

Jari Arkko

2.1.2 Returning Item

Area
Date

INT

Two-Document ballot:
[Open Web Ballot]
- 1 of 1

Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1

draft-ietf-pana-pana-18.txt

Note: Returning for ballot by new ADs

Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA) Framework (Informational)

draft-ietf-pana-framework-10.txt

Note: Returning for ballot by new ADs

Token:

Mark Townsley

2.2 Individual Submissions

2.2.1 New Item

NONE

2.2.2 Returning Item

NONE

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable

contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If

not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New Item

NONE

3.1.2 Returning Item

NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable

contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If

not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New Item

Area
Date

RAI

Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Session Mobility (Informational) - 1 of 1

draft-shacham-sipping-session-mobility-04.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Jon Peterson

3.2.2 Returning Item

NONE

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not

found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The

IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG

<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks

that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends

not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this

document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should

therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG

approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an

IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should

therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in

the the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG

Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions

indicate consensus with the response proposed by the

document shepherd.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will

be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.3.1 New Item

Area
Date

GEN

Media Server Markup Language (MSML) (Informational) - 1 of 1

draft-saleem-msml-05.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: IESG Note:    3. The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to the IETF work done in the SPEECHSC WG and recommends not publishing the document at this time.

Token:

Jon Peterson

3.3.2 Returning Item

NONE

4. Working Group Actions

4.1 WG Creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review

NONE

4.1.2 Proposed for Approval

Area
Date

INT

Aug 24

IPv6 Maintenance (6man) - 1 of 1

Token:

Jari

4.2 WG Rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review

NONE

4.2.2 Proposed for Approval

NONE

5. IAB News We Can Use

6. Management Issues

6.1 Draft deadline for 00 WG drafts (Cullen Jennings)

6.2 Executive Session for Appeal (Russ Housley)

7. Working Group News

_______________________________________________
IESG-AGENDA-DIST mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist