Subject: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (HTML) for January 8, 2009

From: IESG Secretary <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:19:46 -0800 (PST)

IESG Agenda

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2009-01-08).

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll Call

1.2 Bash the Agenda

1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat

1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a

reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet

infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG Submissions

2.1.1 New Item

Area
Date

RTG

Simplified Extension of LSP Space for IS-IS (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3

draft-ietf-isis-wg-extlsp-05.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Ross Callon

RAI

A Framework for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Session Policies (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3

draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-05.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Cullen Jennings

RTG

Capabilities Advertisement with BGP-4 (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 3

draft-ietf-idr-rfc3392bis-03.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

David Ward

2.1.2 Returning Item

Area
Date

SEC

Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 3.2 Message Specification (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2

draft-ietf-smime-3851bis-08.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Tim Polk

SEC

Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 3.2 Certificate Handling (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2

draft-ietf-smime-3850bis-08.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Tim Polk

2.2 Individual Submissions

2.2.1 New Item

NONE

2.2.2 Returning Item

Area
Date

GEN

IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions (BCP) - 1 of 1

draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-06.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: Diff: http://www.arkko.com/ietf/iesg/rfc3932bisdiff.html

Token:

Jari Arkko

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable

contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If

not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New Item

Area
Date

SEC

DES and IDEA Cipher Suites for Transport Layer Security (TLS) (Informational) - 1 of 2

draft-ietf-tls-des-idea-02.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Tim Polk

TSV

Packet Delay Variation Applicability Statement (Informational) - 2 of 2

draft-ietf-ippm-delay-var-as-01.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Lars Eggert

3.1.2 Returning Item

Area
Date

RTG

The RPF Vector TLV (Informational) - 1 of 1

draft-ietf-pim-rpf-vector-06.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

David Ward

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable

contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If

not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New Item

Area
Date

RTG

Performance Analysis of Inter-Domain Path Computation Methodologies (Informational) - 1 of 3

draft-dasgupta-ccamp-path-comp-analysis-02.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Ross Callon

INT

VoIP Configuration Server Address Option (Informational) - 2 of 3

draft-raj-dhc-tftp-addr-option-04.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Jari Arkko

INT

Service Selection for Mobile IPv4 (Informational) - 3 of 3

draft-korhonen-mip4-service-07.txt

Token:

Jari Arkko

3.2.2 Returning Item

NONE

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not

found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The

IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG

<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks

that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends

not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this

document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should

therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG

approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an

IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should

therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in

the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG

Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions

indicate consensus with the response proposed by the

document shepherd.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will

be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.3.1 New Item

NONE

3.3.2 Returning Item

NONE

4. Working Group Actions

4.1 WG Creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review

NONE

4.1.2 Proposed for Approval

Area
Date

APP

Dec 11

Message Organization (morg) - 1 of 1

Token:

Chris

4.2 WG Rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review

Area
Date

OPS

Dec 17

Network Configuration (netconf) - 1 of 2

Token:

Dan

TSV

Dec 19

IP Performance Metrics (ippm) - 2 of 2

Token:

Lars

4.2.2 Proposed for Approval

NONE

5. IAB News We Can Use

6. Management Issues

6.1 Nomcom appointment to the IAOC (Ross Callon)

7. Working Group News

_______________________________________________
IESG-AGENDA-DIST mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg-agenda-dist