Subject: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (HTML) for May 21, 2009

From: IESG Secretary <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:13:37 -0700 (PDT)

IESG Agenda

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2009-05-21).

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll Call

1.2 Bash the Agenda

1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat

1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a

reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet

infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG Submissions

2.1.1 New Item

Area
Date

TSV

RSVP Extensions for Path-Triggered RSVP Receiver Proxy (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3

draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-proxy-proto-09.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: Please read the informational document draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-proxy-approaches before this one!

Token:

Magnus Westerlund

INT

IPv4 Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3

draft-ietf-netlmm-pmip6-ipv4-support-12.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Jari Arkko

TSV

DCCP Simultaneous-Open Technique to Facilitate NAT/Middlebox Traversal (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 3

draft-ietf-dccp-simul-open-08.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Lars Eggert

2.1.2 Returning Item

Area
Date

SEC

An Internet Attribute Certificate Profile for Authorization (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1

draft-ietf-pkix-3281update-05.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Tim Polk

2.2 Individual Submissions

2.2.1 New Item

NONE

2.2.2 Returning Item

Area
Date

RAI

H.248/MEGACO Registration Procedures (BCP) - 1 of 1

draft-groves-megaco-pkgereg-03.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: IESG - when reviewing this, please consider the topic of if it is alright to register a "public" package when the specification is not publicly available. This came up as an IETF LC comment.

Token:

Cullen Jennings

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable

contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If

not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New Item

Area
Date

TSV

Adding Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Capability to TCP's SYN/ACK Packets (Experimental) - 1 of 3

draft-ietf-tcpm-ecnsyn-09.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Lars Eggert

SEC

DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Service Overview (Informational) - 2 of 3

draft-ietf-dkim-overview-11.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Pasi Eronen

TSV

RSVP Proxy Approaches (Informational) - 3 of 3

draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-proxy-approaches-07.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: Read this before the Protocol document

Token:

Magnus Westerlund

3.1.2 Returning Item

NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable

contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If

not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New Item

NONE

3.2.2 Returning Item

NONE

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not

found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The

IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG

<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks

that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends

not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this

document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should

therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG

approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an

IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should

therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in

the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG

Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions

indicate consensus with the response proposed by the

document shepherd.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will

be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.3.1 New Item

NONE

3.3.2 Returning Item

NONE

3.3.3 For Action

Area
Date

INT

The Subnetwork Encapsulation and Adaptation Layer (SEAL) (Informational) - 1 of 2

draft-templin-seal-23.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: Brought back to the agenda because of desired status change (now Inf)

Token:

Jari Arkko

GEN

Unintended Consequence of two NAT deployments with Overlapping Address Space (Informational) - 2 of 2

draft-ford-behave-top-06.txt

Token:

Russ Housley

4. Working Group Actions

4.1 WG Creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review

NONE

4.1.2 Proposed for Approval

Area
Date

APP

Apr 29

Yet Another Mail (yam) - 1 of 1

Token:

Alexey

4.2 WG Rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review

NONE

4.2.2 Proposed for Approval

NONE

5. IAB News We Can Use

6. Management Issues

6.1 Revision 1.9 for ID-Checklist.html (Russ Housley)

6.2 Shepherd names in agendas (Jari Arkko)

6.3 Ballot Procedures (Russ Housley)

7. Working Group News