Subject: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] IESG Telechat Agenda (HTML) for August 27, 2009

From: IESG Secretary <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:33:02 -0700 (PDT)

IESG Agenda

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2009-08-13).

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll Call

1.2 Bash the Agenda

1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat

1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a

reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet

infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG Submissions

2.1.1 New Item

Area
Date

TSV

Layered Coding Transport (LCT) Building Block (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 12

draft-ietf-rmt-bb-lct-revised-10.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Magnus Westerlund

APP

Sieve Email Filtering: MIME part Tests, Iteration, Extraction, Replacement and Enclosure (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 12

draft-ietf-sieve-mime-loop-09.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: Alexey Melnikov <[email-masked]> is the document shepherd for this document.

Token:

Lisa Dusseault

RTG

LDP End-of-LIB (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 12

draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-end-of-lib-03.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: Proto write-up has been revised. Make sure to use new version.

Token:

Adrian Farrel

OPS

Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 12

draft-ietf-netconf-partial-lock-09.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Dan Romascanu

SEC

PA-TNC: A Posture Attribute Protocol (PA) Compatible with TNC (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 12

draft-ietf-nea-pa-tnc-04.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Tim Polk

SEC

PB-TNC: A Posture Broker Protocol (PB) Compatible with TNC (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 12

draft-ietf-nea-pb-tnc-04.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Tim Polk

OPS

Diameter Quality of Service Application (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 12

draft-ietf-dime-diameter-qos-11.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: Victor Fajardo [[email-masked]] is the document shepherd for this document.

Token:

Dan Romascanu

OPS

Mapping Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Notifications to SYSLOG Messages (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 12

draft-ietf-opsawg-syslog-snmp-04.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: Scott Bradner ([email-masked]) is the document shepherd.

Token:

Dan Romascanu

OPS

Definitions of Managed Objects for Mapping SYSLOG Messages to Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Notifications (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 12

draft-ietf-opsawg-syslog-msg-mib-05.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: Scott Bradner ([email-masked]) is the document shepherd.

Token:

Dan Romascanu

RTG

Four-octet AS Specific BGP Extended Community (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 12

draft-ietf-l3vpn-as4octet-ext-community-03.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Ross Callon

RTG

MPLS-TP Requirements (Proposed Standard) - 11 of 12

draft-ietf-mpls-tp-requirements-09.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: Loa Andersson ([email-masked]) is the document shepherd.

Token:

Adrian Farrel

RTG

IPv6 Address Specific BGP Extended Communities Attribute (Proposed Standard) - 12 of 12

draft-ietf-l3vpn-v6-ext-communities-02.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Ross Callon

2.1.2 Returning Item

NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions

2.2.1 New Item

Area
Date

GEN

Special Use IPv4 Addresses (BCP) - 1 of 2

draft-iana-rfc3330bis-07.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Russ Housley

APP

Sieve Email Filtering: Sieves and display directives in XML (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2

draft-freed-sieve-in-xml-05.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: Cyrus Daboo <[email-masked]> is the document shepherd. This is a Sieve WG document, despite the name.

Token:

Lisa Dusseault

2.2.2 Returning Item

Area
Date

GEN

IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions (BCP) - 1 of 2

draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-07.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: There is no document shepherd

Token:

Jari Arkko

GEN

Guidance on Interoperation and Implementation Reports for Advancement to Draft Standard (BCP) - 2 of 2

draft-dusseault-impl-reports-04.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Tim Polk

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable

contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If

not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New Item

Area
Date

TSV

NAT Behavior Discovery Using STUN (Experimental) - 1 of 3

draft-ietf-behave-nat-behavior-discovery-07.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Magnus Westerlund

OPS

IPFIX Export per SCTP Stream (Informational) - 2 of 3

draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream-03.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Dan Romascanu

INT

Application of Ethernet Pseudowires to MPLS Transport Networks (Informational) - 3 of 3

draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-transport-04.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Note: Matthew Bocci ([email-masked]) is the document shepherd

Token:

Ralph Droms

3.1.2 Returning Item

NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable

contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If

not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New Item

Area
Date

GEN

IANA IPv4 Special Purpose Address Registry (Informational) - 1 of 1

draft-iana-special-ipv4-registry-01.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Russ Housley

3.2.2 Returning Item

Area
Date

SEC

Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization Extensions (Experimental) - 1 of 1

draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt
[Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Tim Polk

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not

found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The

IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG

<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks

that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends

not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this

document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should

therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG

approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an

IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should

therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in

the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG

Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions

indicate consensus with the response proposed by the

document shepherd.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will

be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.3.1 New Item

NONE

3.3.2 Returning Item

NONE

4. Working Group Actions

4.1 WG Creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review

NONE

4.1.2 Proposed for Approval

NONE

4.2 WG Rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review

NONE

4.2.2 Proposed for Approval

Area
Date

INT

Jul 9

Mobility for IPv4 (mip4) - 1 of 1

Token:

Jari

5. IAB News We Can Use

6. Management Issues

6.1 IETF Review of ITU-T MPLS-TP Documents (Adrian Farrel)

6.2 Issue last call for Language Tag experts as per draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-23 (Alexey Melnikov)

6.3 Status of 128.66.0.0/16 [IANA #256883] (Michelle Cotton)

6.4 Management Item: Expert for Megaco [IANA #257207] (Michelle Cotton)

7. Working Group News