Subject: [ietf-dkim] New Requirement: SSP must|should support DKIM-BASE semantics

From: "Hector Santos" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 12:12:59 -0400

I think the #1 requirement should begin as:

 - SSP requirements must|should support DKIM-BASE semantics.

or rephrased:

 - SSP requirements should|most not alter DKIM-BASE semantics.

I think this is important because we might find out very quickly that there
are some loose ends in DKIM-BASE.  This is especially true in the area of
multiple signatures.

--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html