Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom

From: Scott Kitterman <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 8:06 -0600

On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 10:07:52 -0700 Dave Crocker <[email-masked]> wrote:

>Bottom Line:
>
>     Although it is essential that a protocol specification be deployed 
only
>after due deliberation, it is equally essential that it be concise, 
coherent and
>compelling.
>
>     In other words the market needs to understand it and needs to believe 
its
>adoption is important... for the near term.
>
>All of this argues strongly for the criterion I suggested.
>
OK, but that's all fodder for the final design.  We are currently 
discussing requirements.  Prematurely cutting off requirements discussion 
has its own risks.

I agree the what we deliver in the end must be as simple as reasoanbly 
possible, but the time to decide what that is has not yet arrived.

Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html