Subject: RE: [ietf-dkim] 1365 yes/no

From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:40:31 -0800

> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] 1365 yes/no
> 
> 
> On Feb 28, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> >
> > issue #1365 calls for eliminating requirement
> > 6.3.2 which says:
> >
> > "   [PROVISIONAL] The Protocol MUST be able to publish a Practice
> >         which is indicative that domain doesn't send mail."
> >
> > If you want to eliminate that requirement say: +1 If you 
> want to keep 
> > that requirement say: -1

+1 its out of charter scope

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html