Subject: [ietf-dkim] [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-hoffman-dac-vbr-04.txt]

From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:18:09 -0700

[email-masked] wrote:
> The draft doesn't specify a discussion venue.  I believe the plan is to request 
> Informational RFC status.
>
> With respect to the IETF, is there a better place for discussion than the DKIM list?
>   

mail-vet-discuss?

I don't imagine A-R will be there a whole lot longer, but I could be wrong.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html