Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal

From: Tony Hansen <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:27:39 -0500

All of those clarifications were also filed as errata. All of the ones 
that were ratified by the working group should be incorporated as part 
of a 4871+5672bis. In other words, yes, that's definitely one of the 
tasks that should be part of moving the document forward.

	Tony Hansen
	[email-masked]

John Levine wrote:
> It occurs to me that there are a bunch of technical clarifications to
> the spec that (I think) Tony wrote up after the connectathon a year or
> so ago.  If we want to move to DS, would it be worth a pass over 4871
> to incorporate them?  I don't think there have been any more recently,
> so this would probably count as making it more mature.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html