Subject: 1 step plan (Settlement)

From: Tax Debt Paid Off <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 10:21:18 -0700

NationWide Tax Debt Relief Program
RE: Settlement Package for Ietf-dkim-archive
2Nd Notice - Please Confirm Upon Receipt >> http://www.portcutlery.com/irs/nationawide/help/settlement.index
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Tax Debt Status Report:

Due to the fact that an overwhelming people have failed to file taxes for both 2012 and 2013,
a nation-wide program has been put into place to help citizens to avoid audits, tax liens etc...

- We ask the avoid the urge not to file this year (even though the deadline passed) because that 
is only making it worse as well as increasing penalties against you.

->  Accept this IRS Settlement Below 

	* View Settlement for Ietf-dkim-archive here: / http://www.portcutlery.com/irs/nationawide/help/settlement.index

Regards, 

- Urgent Info Services 

to modify settings - Urgent Info Services 
3205 Lake Sarah
Independence, MN 55359 or http://www.portcutlery.com/jnfo4t/sngi4.gn59u

and the owner name in the system catalog would be "SOMEONE", rather than 'someone'. If you enclose the owner name in double quotes, it acts like a delimited identifier. With standard SQL, delimited identifiers can be used many places. With Informix, you can use them only around owner names -- in other contexts, Informix treats both single-quoted and double-quoted strings as strings, rather than sepa single-quoted strings as strings and double-quoted strings as delimited identifiers. (Of course, just for completeness, there is an environment variable, DELIMIDENT, that can be set - to any value, but Y is safest - to indicate that double quotes always surround delimited identifiers and single quotes always surround strings.)+1 cause I hadn't heard of mongoDB before seeing this post (& am getting tired of waiting for CouchDB)   Jason S Aug 24 '09 at 15:07
2	  	
Looking through the answers, I didn't really find what I was looking for. Since both databases are so much alike, which one should I chose? What are the benefits of either one of them? For what kind of application should I chose which? Would be nice if someone could answer those questions.   polemon Aug 18 '10 at 22:26
  	  	
It really depends on how they will be used. The lack of transactions is troubling for many environments, yet perfectly fine for others. Also it is fundamentally difficult to "back up" a distributed database, although the argument is that data persistence is ensured through replication across multiple shards.   Samuel O'Malley Oct 18 '13 at 5:20
2	  	
Though this is an old question it's still very valid. For anyone ending up here like I did, you really should read the following blog post (about MongoDB) if DB reliability is a big concern: link. The author is a prof. at Cornell, which should give his analysis some credibility. Unrelated sidenote: this is one of the authors who published a paper on the 'selfish miner' attack regarding Bitcoin-mining.   pauluss86 Jan 20 at 20:42
2	  	
@pauluss86 I think you should probably add the disclaimer to pauluss86's link that the author (Emin) is actually from a competitor to MongoDB (Hyperdex) - so just a slight bias there. To be really fair, there's a corresponding response on InfoQ from MongoDB here@victorhooi true, but it remains a valid concern in my opinion. There's also a follow-up to the InfoQ response: link. Personally, I'm not too convinced by Mongo's defense. In any case, I recommend anyone to read up on the issue (both sides) before choosing a database.   pauluss86 Feb 25 at 0:50
ur goals were:

Easy replication from a master-db to several clients with different documents.

Fast pre-calculated data like "how many parts do I have with this attribute and that filter, fitting to those conditions"

facts:

Our shops are now running much faster than with MySQL (and mysql-database needed additionaly 1-3 days of pre-calculating (so updating was twice a month), making the data ready for product counting and filtering, CouchDB needs 5 hours, so we could update product data every night)
Setting up (filtered) data distribution & backups to the shop nodes is fast and easy
but also:

Understanding map/reduce and the limits of not having joins is quite hard
No operation on data like "delete where" or "update where" without external programs
Replication works well, unless there is a problem; then it's really hard to find out what was the reason (for beginners)
The installation of CouchDB without binaries (yes there are a some in the wild, but not for every OS/version) could be hard, if you are not a Linux geek. But the CouchDB Community is helpful (#couchdb), and luckily there are companies out there (cloudant, iriscouch) that offer services from  to big business.
CouchDB is moving forward, so there are a lot of changes (improvements) going on that might change they way you work. But basic things remain stable.
As a result: MySQL as a database for data creation and maintaining is reliable and easy to understand and handle. I think we will not change this. But I also don't want to miss the power of CouchDB views and the ease of replication setup.

Production couches sometimes caused trouble after months of work due to misconfiguration and forgotten logrotates (view building takes too long or hangs, replication stops), but never lost data, and always could be easily reset.

This says it all db-engines.com/en/ranking MongoDB is gaining ground day by day and is most popular Document Store on the web