Subject: Yale research confirms cure/reversal

From: Alzheimer's Cure Found <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 09:46:04 -0800

ScienceDaily
Your source for latest research

Permanent Cure For Alzheimer's and Dementia

Feb 04, 2015

Yale research confirms a simple at home treatment that can reverse Alzheimer's and Dementia.

It's already been proven to cure and reverse Memory deteriorating agents.

http://www.scienceNews/Yale-Alzeimers-research/774563/

This research is so astounding that all curable steps can be done is the comfort of ones own home.

See video explaination ➙

http://www.alz.org/alzheimers_disease_what_is_alzheimers.aspThe avocados on our tree will be ready to pick in the next 2-4 weeks. They still have to ripen and soften once picked, which usually takes about a week or so, but if picked too soon the only thing they will do is basically rot and never get soft.

All S.D. reports have backed sources and research. Presented material is accurate.
TurnnerJY-Center | 17502 Melody Cir | Dubuque | IA_52001 Se.tti.ngs

CDC: Flu Vaccine Is The Least Effective In A Decade

This answer is better becauseArrays.streamhas all the overloaded cases for primitive arrays. I.eStream.of(new int[]{1,2,3})will give you aStream<int[]>whereasArrays.streamwill give you back anIntStreamwhich is probably what you want. So +1user2336315Jan 11 at 15:27

2

@Dima I was answering the"How do I create a Stream from an array"My example is simplified to fit in the comment (and yes in this case, I would call alsoofwith the values), but you could have defined the int array before wanting to transform it in a Stream. That's why Arrays.stream is better for transforming an array into a Stream (and my example was to show the difference between both, which was not mentioned in the answer at first).user2336315Jan 11 at 16:03

2

@Dima I guess it's a matter of taste. I mean better in a senseStream.ofcould give you some surprises (like when you callArrays.asListwith a primitive array and that people expect aList<Integer>back) :-)user2336315Jan 11 at 16:11

3

Arrays.streamsupports streaming a range of the array, whichIntStream.ofdoesn’t. In contrast,Stream.ofis the better choice if youwantaStream<int[]>of size1HolgerJan 11 at 16:46

2

@Dima The subrange overload ofArrays.streamis preferable to usingStream.of(array).skip(n).limit(m)because the former results in a SIZED stream whereas the latter does not. The reason is thatlimit(m)doesn't know whether the size ismor less thanm, whereasArrays.streamdoes range checks and knows the exact size of the stream.Stuart MarksJan 11 at 23:23