Subject: Re: draft-eastlake-rfc2777bis-selection-01.txt

From: Randy Bush <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 12:42:04 -0700

Christian Huitema wrote:
> The recommendation appears technically sound, but the process is
> very much a geeky option compared to the previous "standard",
> picking names from a hat.

the procedure of 2777[bis] has the wonderful property of being
reproducable and verifiable by anyone, external, internal, five
years later, ...  this is an extremely valuable property.  hence
i suggest that it be formalized as practice.

randy