Subject: Re: [EAI] ulabel

From: "Jiankang YAO" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:41:50 +0800

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Shawn Steele" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 5:58 AM
Subject: Re: [EAI] ulabel

>> the user may confuse the old label and new label.
>> but label and uLabel is easy to de differented.
> 
> Ulabel makes me wary because its use in IDN presumes there's an alabel.  So the connotations make me uneasy (whether that's reasonable or not).
Ulabel was prevented before idna2008 defined a u-label and a-label.
ulabel may be similar to u-labe.

but we will not confuse Umailbox with u-label.

so I think that we still keep Umailbox, Ucharacter, Uatom......

the  general name of all the labels including   Umailbox, Ucharacter and Uatom may be utf-8label.

> 
> So I'd prefer utf8-label:)
> 
> -Shawn
> _______________________________________________
> IMA mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima