Subject: [Int-area] Please stay respectful .... Re: IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:32:41 +0000

Sorry to be forced to patronize WG members, but, those two email messages are really close to be aggressive... I.e., they do not add any value to the discussion.

-éric

PS : Ted, we all know that you are both a coder and a RFC author 😊

From: Int-area <[email-masked]> on behalf of Khaled Omar <[email-masked]>
Date: Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 16:35
To: Ted Lemon <[email-masked]>
Cc: int-area <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

Ted,

Do you have that skillset?

Khaled Omar

From: Ted Lemon <[email-masked]>
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 4:34 PM
To: Khaled Omar <[email-masked]>
Cc: int-area <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

On Sep 17, 2020, at 10:31 AM, Khaled Omar <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:
I’m not a code developer, really we are repeating same requirements, so what is the meaning of a work group?!!!!!

If you can’t write code, what business do you have proposing standards? Proposing standards is an additional skill on top of network programming, not a separate skillset.