Subject: Re: [Iot-directorate] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-x509-07: (with COMMENT)

From: Ivaylo Petrov <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2020 19:53:30 +0100

Hello,

Thank you for your review! I have currently removed the paragraph about the
examples from the draft and asked if anyone would volunteer to create the
examples.

--
Best regards,
Ivaylo

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:25 PM Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <
[email-masked]> wrote:

> Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-cose-x509-07: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-x509/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Strange feeling to review this Jim Schaad's document...
>
> Thank you Carsten for the IoT directorate review at:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-cose-x509-07-iotdir-telechat-bormann-2020-10-19/
>
> The major issue found by Carsten (missing files in the github repo) should
> be
> resolved before publication.
>
> -éric
>
>
>
>