Subject: RE: On-link assumption refuses to go away

From: "Soliman Hesham" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:47:35 -0400

Thanks for the catch, I missed it. I'll update it in my 
version for the next submission.

Hesham

 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:[email-masked]]
 > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 8:26 AM
 > To: Soliman Hesham; [email-masked]
 > Subject: On-link assumption refuses to go away
 > 
 > 
 > Hi Hesham,
 >   The latest revision of RFC2461bis still contains the 
 > on-link assumption 
 > when no default routers are present. I do notice that the 
 > text about the 
 > on-link assumption in section 5.2 has been removed but the 
 > following text 
 > is present in section 6.3.6 regarding default router selection.
 > 
 >      3) If the Default Router List is empty, assume that all
 >         destinations are on-link as specified in Section 5.2.
 > 
 > Should this be removed as well?
 > 
 > Cheers
 > Suresh
 > 
 >   
 > 

===========================================================
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
 of the intended recipient.  Any review or distribution by others is strictly
 prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender
 and delete all copies.
===========================================================

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email-masked]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------