Subject: draft agenda for Minneapolis

From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:05:31 -0500

Chair pro tem: Scott Brim

 5      Administrivia, agenda bashing

30      Trademarks: draft-ietf-ipr-trademarks-00.txt
		Assuming that someone wants to note that some term
		in a document is a trademark, how should this be
		done?  What other disclosures should/must be filed?
		What are the timing constraints, if any?

		Desired output: sense of the room about general
		principles, to be folded into a revised draft.

20      Rechartering
                Discuss the proposed new draft charter

30      Copying draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00.txt
		In accordance with the outcome of the charter
		discussion, under what conditions may people copy
		some or all of an RFC?  The current position is
		(a) for IETF RFCs, anything goes within the IETF
		standards process; (b) anyone can make full copies
		or translations; (c) MIBs can be extracted and
		embedded in devices.  Do we want to permit more
		copying?  With what limits, if any?

		Desired output: sense of the room about general
		principles.  Note that the draft under discussion
		is not a WG document.

35      Defensive patent licenses
		In accordance with the outcome of the charter
		discussion, and in particular on the defensive
		patent issue, start the discussion.  Discussions
		of the current IETF patent policy are out of scope
		-- we settled it for 3668, and I see no reason to
		reopen at this time.

		Desired output: the beginning of a list of points
		to include in the document.

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg