Subject: RE: IPR disclosure pages not set up for trademark (or copyright)disclosures?

From: "Contreras, Jorge" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:00:54 -0500

Good point -- it would make sense to have an option
to disclose "other" rights at a minimum (or copyright
and trademark specifically).

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]On Behalf
Of Bill Sommerfeld
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 3:59 PM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: IPR disclosure pages not set up for trademark (or
copyright)disclosures?

we have discussed and draft-ietf-ipr-trademark-00.txt proposes filing IPR
notifications in the case of trademark issues.  I took a quick look at the
disclosure pages at:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr_disclosure.cgi

The top level pages say "IPR disclosure", but the forms you reach from 
there, including:

	https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr.cgi
	https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr_generic.cgi
	https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr_notify.cgi

all use very patent-specific language.

						- Bill

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg