Subject: Re: Counter proposal to draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update-00.txt

From: [email-masked] (Scott Bradner)
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 13:38:34 -0400 (EDT)

Frank postulates:
> Vague impression:  It tries to protect the
> IETF and/or the RfC editor, and it tries to get away with
> the minimal rights required for this purpose in the US.

if you drop "in the US" that is basically what the BCP is tring to do
(and says so in the introduction)

Scott

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg