Subject: IPR Issues - because of this new ED of Texas ruling the license to use the IP MUST be included inside the IPR filing.

From: tglassey <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:25:40 -0800

Read em and weep Jorge...  The actual License Itself MUST be a part of 
the IPR FILING or a much stronger term set included.

This is an amazing ruling since it pertains to IPR disclosures here - it 
made the entire IPR workpage with regard to its commitments for license 
a total waste. They are now no longer enforceable without the actual 
contracts there themselves.

So lets see - this makes it US Courts 10, IETF - 0...

Todd

-- 
Regards TSG
"Ex-Cruce-Leo"

//Confidential Mailing - Please destroy this if you are not the intended recipient.