Subject: RE: Endianness of IPv6 and payloads

From: Tim Enos <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 10:12:41 -0500 (CDT)

Good morning all,

John makes an excellent point. I'd be happy to assist anyone writing the draft.

Best Regards,

Tim
Rom 8:28

>From: [email-masked]
>Date: 2006/09/16 Sat PM 11:31:41 CDT
>To: [email-masked], [email-masked]
>Cc: [email-masked]
>Subject: RE: Endianness of IPv6 and payloads

>Gentlemen,
>
>>> It would seem a fairly simple yet worthwhile thing to standardize the
>
>>> endianness of IPv6 (both headers and payload for that matter).
>>> Is it the majority view that we should do this?
>>
>>I'm in favor. It's certainly a better use of the IETF's 
>>collective time than all the process discussions.
>
>So why doesn't someone write-up a draft, get a couple of people to
>review it
>and given this email thread, there should be enough energy to push it 
>as an informational / individual submission.
>
>John

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email-masked]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------