Subject: comments on draft-fz-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-05

From: Giuseppe Fioccola <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:34:28 +0000

Dear Bob, Tom and All,

I would like to summarize the outcome of the discussion.
Our intention is to work on a new version of the draft and highlight that HBH and DOH are the main alternatives to apply the Alternate Marking Method to IPv6. We can just mention that, in addition to HBH and DOH, draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header suggests the possibility of SRH TLV that could also carry the AltMark data fields in case of SRv6 application, but the usage of SRH TLV is still under discussion within the community and so it is not the preferred solution. HBH and DOH can be considered the most suitable ways to implement Alternate Marking.
The new revision will address all the comments from Bob as well.

Please let us know if you agree, so I will work on the new version of the draft.

Regards,

Giuseppe