Subject: CRH Draft Update - IPv6 Addressing

From: Ron Bonica <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 22:43:13 +0000

Folks,

During the last call, Eric Vyncke and other recommended enhancing the introduction, describing deployment scenarios where it is applicable and SRv6 is not.

Does the following sentence work for everyone:

"The CRH is applicable in environments where the IPv6 destination address represents an interface, as described in RFC 4291. The CRH does not require an instruction to be encoded in the IPv6 destination address".

This differentiates the CRH from all of the SRv6 proposals.

                                                     Ron

Juniper Business Use Only