Subject: RE: [Isis-wg] RE: draft-ietf-isis-igp-p2p-over-lan-00.txt

From: Jeff Learman <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 10:50:03 -0400

Jeff, this is isis-wg, not isis-update.
Definitely out-of-scope for isis-update.

At 10:29 AM 4/19/2002, Jeff Parker wrote:
> 
>> I think that a new multicast address would be far better than 
>> a broadcast address because it would cause fewer problems 
>> when (not IF, but WHEN) an interface configured for PTP 
>> is attached to a broadcast LAN.  It should
>> not be difficult to assign a multicast address.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Jeff L.
> 
>I think this is out of scope for this document.  
>We need to document what works today, what assumptions
>are made, and what you need to do in order to 
>interoperate with existing practice.  
>
>One conclusion may be that certain configurations 
>should not be expected to work with all implementations.
>This isn't normative: this is reality.  
>
>- jeff parker

_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list  -  [email-masked]
http://spider.juniper.net/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg