Subject: Re: [Jcardcal] Reminder about IPR disclosure requirements relating to draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcardRe:

From: Mike Douglass <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 10:19:42 -0400

I am not personally aware of any IPR that applies to 
draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcard.

Mike Douglass

> *From: *Bert Greevenbosch <[email-masked] 
> <mailto:[email-masked]>>
> *Subject: **[Jcardcal] Reminder about IPR disclosure requirements 
> relating to draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcard*
> *Date: *May 22, 2013 12:22:28 AM PDT
> *To: *"[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>" 
> <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>>
> *Cc: *"[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>" <[email-masked] 
> <mailto:[email-masked]>>, Peter Saint-Andre <[email-masked] 
> <mailto:[email-masked]>>
>
> Dear JCARDCAL WG:
> Before issuing the Working Group Last Call for 
> draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcard, we would like to check whether any claims 
> of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) on the document have not yet 
> been disclosed.
> Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to 
> draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcard?  If so, has this IPR been disclosed in 
> compliance with IETF IPR rules?  (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 
> for more details.)
> If you are a document author or listed contributor on this document, 
> please reply to this email regardless of whether or not you are 
> personally aware of any relevant IPR.  We might not be able to advance 
> this document to the next stage until we have received a reply from 
> each author and listed contributor.
> If you are on the JCARDCAL WG email list but are not an author or 
> listed contributor for this document, you are reminded of your 
> opportunity for a voluntary IPR disclosure under BCP 79.  Please do 
> not reply unless you want to make such a voluntary disclosure.
> Online tools for filing IPR disclosures can be found at
> <http://www.ietf.org/ipr/file-disclosure>.
> Best regards,
> Peter and Bert
> (as co-chairs)